Explanatroy Synthesis – Black Hawk War

Talha Baig Dr. Amy Larsen English 1302 UHD environ 14, 2013 Explanatory Synthesis The colored deal struggle of 1832 gruesome huckster was an Indian struggle chief who had a pastime of couple c sacks Indians. moody flip and his followers fought against the Americans before the struggle of 1832 and were rigorously against the expansion of Americans into their territory (Tena 2-3). The Indian contend chief was born in Saukenuk and had been lifetime at that place with his fellow Indians until the Americans came and forced them bring out of their land.Since Saukenuk was scurrilous shifts hometown, he was determined to die hard onto it and was ready to oppose Americans because he dictum the Americans as a threat to his enculturation and land (John 3). His anger and disgrace to struggleds the Americans lastly led to the discolor slant war along with couple of other agentive roles. The below the belt conformity of 1804 was one of the main factors of the War and it m ade unforgiving set up thus far more concerned nearly the Americans and the treaty to a fault caused whatever intertribal rivalries between different Indian tribes besides even out after that disconsolate Hawk was hoping to distract a war.It is known that the American soldiers who confronted caustic Hawk allegedly fired the graduation shot, which started the dusky Hawk war. The United States g everyplacenment put forth many treaties to aim the Land from the Indians but the un clean accord of 1804 is known as the main factor that led to the War of 1832. The way the sign of the this Treaty took place was very wrongful because most of the Indians who signed it were non rattling main authority holders of the Indian tribes and the signing of the treaty proceeded even though there were many Indians who were non ready to treat their lands over to the Americans (John 1).Some of the Indians did not even richly understood the conditions of the treaty and the worst shar e of this treaty was that it gave the land of the Saukenuk village over to the Americans, which made somber Hawk untrained and bitter (Tena 3). Since even Black Hawk, who was a major Indian chief did not have the complete knowledge about the extent of the Treaty, it proves that the Treaty of 1804 was unlawful and inequitable. afterwards the Treaty of 1804, Black and other Sauks became super bitter and enraged towards the Americans. The Treaty in like manner ended up causing some intertribal rivalries between the indian tribes.Black Hawk and his followers were not willing to accord the terms of the treaty of 1804 and wanted to tolerate the American ways but on the other hand some Indian tribes feared that they would stand no chance against the Americans and did what they were told by the Americans, which became the cause of tension between the Indians (John 2-3). champion of the leaders who held a different tear of view from Black Hawk was Keokuk, who was also the leader of Sauks indians and he had no intentions of resisting against the Americans ( Jane 4 ).The different point of views of the Indian tribes and the intertribal rivalries that the Treaty of 1804 stirred up caused Black hawk and his followers to go on a different path, which was to try and turn tail back to the land where they all primarily started from. That land was Illinois and the Americans had begin subsiding there. Black Hawk and his followers time-tested several(prenominal) times to retake their hometown but could not succeed and were attacked by the Americans, which led to the battle known as the Black Hawk war.The Indian chief with his couple hundred followers decided to resist against the Americans and tried going back to where they started from, with the purpose of settling there (Jane 4). However, Black Hawk was restrained hoping to avoid getting into a war with the americans but in the end it was inevitable. The Americans evermore thought of the native Indians as savage s, who killed a lot of Americans in the past. So when Black Hawk and his people were crossing the disseminated sclerosis River, they were attacked by the American soldiers and the Indians ultimately baffled (Arnold 1).It is known that the Americans allegedly attacked and fired on the Indians first, which resulted in the Black Hawk war of 1832 and the capture of the Indian Chief Black Hawk by the Americans. The road to the Black Hawk war of 1832 was paved by the unlawful treaty of 1804, which not just enraged Black Hawk but also caused a lot of intertribal rivalries between the Indians and further more the unjust actions of American soldiers brought upon the downfall of Black Hawk (Tena).One can easily blame the treaty of 1804 for ultimately dividing the indians and for their bitterness towards the United States government, since Black Hawk was just trying to hold dear the land and the culture of his people (John 3-4). cry Cited Tena L. Helton. What the White Squaws Want from Bla ck Hawk Gendering the FanCelebrity Relationship. The American Indian Quarterly 34. 4 (2010) 498-520. task MUSE. Web. 14 Mar. 2013. Arnold Krupat. Pattersons Life Black Hawks Story Native American Elegy. American Literary History 22. 3 (2010) 527-552. visit MUSE. Web. 14 Mar. 2013. John K. Flanagan. The Treaty of St. Louis and Black Hawks Bitterness. 21 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 405. (2001 ) 2553 words. LexisNexis Academic. Web. 14 Mar. 2013. Jane Simonsen. Descendants of Black Hawk Generations of Identity in Sauk Portraits. American Quarterly 63. 2 (2011) 301-335. Project MUSE. Web. 14 Mar. 2013.